If you want to educate others, you yourself need to be educated. If you want to have any kind of influence on young people, you yourself need to stay young and continuously work on yourself.


Simon Gfeller, Swiss teacher and author (1868 - 1943)

Teaching Practice
assessment, formative assessment, summative assessment, ipsative assessment
By: Martyn Rawson, October 2016, Research Bulletin of the Waldorf Research Institute, Autumn/Winter 2015, Vol 20(2).

Assessment for Learning

Assessment is a vital part of supporting learning because they show how we understand students’ learning and how we give them feedback and advice. This article outlines the main kinds of assessment, showing how they relate to teaching in Waldorf schools. Formative assessment helps us understand learning processes, past, present and helps predict the future. Summative assessment focuses on outcomes, ipsative assessment measures the individual against her own previous achievements.

According to the Swiss Waldorf teacher Robert Thomas, “for as long as schools have existed…one of the teachers’ main tasks has been to observe, evaluate, judge and classify the work of their students.” (Thomas 2005) Thomas goes on to point out that the question of assessment has three central aspects: the what, the how, and the who. The ‘what’ consists of observable, measurable facts; the ‘how’ refers to the relationship between the learner and the teacher; and the ‘who’ indicates the person learning and developing. What we understand about a person is something unique; it cannot be standardized, generalized, or measured. It is also never complete, but always remains open.


We generally assess the past, what has already happened. But assessment also means getting a sense of what is emerging, what is in a state of becoming. We can try to understand the future of the child, as it emerges, to borrow Otto Scharmer’s phrase. (Scharmer 2009) An assessment can also be a kind of message from the future that we, as teachers, attempt to read. This means that we have to create space in our assessment for the person’s potential development, and doing this well can even help a healthy future come about. Therefore, in assessment we need to give space to the voice of the person we are assessing and be open to hints of what he or she may become—the distinctive signature of that person as it manifests in deeds, gestures, and acts of creation. In doing so, we must be most careful not to limit that potential through our judgments based on the past.


The who refers to the person doing the assessing. How we assess sends a message and defines the nature of that relationship. Is it wellintentioned, respectful, and caring, or distancing, objectifying (i.e., making the person into an object, or even a statistic), or labelling (weak, average student or good student)? The quality of an assessment depends on the quality of seeing, listening, and understanding.


Assessing learning in a Waldorf context assumes we know what learning means from an anthroposophical perspective. There has been surprisingly little published on what the Waldorf view of learning actually is, although Jost Schieren recently made an interesting attempt. (Schieren 2012) Learning is a complex theme that I can’t go into here, but perhaps the most important things to remember are that learning is a process that transforms the whole person and thus changes the way we are and how we act, and that it has to do with making and sharing meaning about the self, others, and the world. Let me state at the outset my position regarding assessment for learning. I was jointly responsible for developing and publishing probably the first public definition of learning outcomes grade for grade (for math, English, and first foreign language) in the Waldorf literature. (Mepham & Rawson 1997; Rawson & Richter 2000) Although I have regularly promoted the use of assessment for learning and criticized the lack of good assessment practices in Waldorf schools, over the years I have become concerned that the pendulum has swung too far the other way.


This article revisits one of my basic interests in Waldorf pedagogical principles and is a much shortened version of a longer essay on this topic.


Full version (PDF)


Martyn Rawson has been a Waldorf teacher in schools in England and Germany since 1979. He is the author of several books about Waldorf and co-editor of the English-language curriculum which has meanwhile been translated into 18 languages. From 1996 to 2010 he worked in the collegium of the Pedagogical Section in Dornach. Today he teaches at the Elmshorn Free Waldorf School and the Kiel Teacher Training Seminar.  

Please also look at Martyn's new website on community learning.

This article first appeared in the Research Bulletin of the Waldorf Research Institute, Autumn/Winter 2015, Vol 20(2). With kind permission by the author and the Waldorf Research Institute.

To top

YEP! young eurythmy performance
Fri 15.09.2017 - Thu 15.03.2018
School’s over and Life can begin – what now?    yep! stands for Young Eurythmy...
Regional Conferences on the Importance of Sleep
Sun 01.10.2017 - Sat 31.03.2018
  An Invitation to Collaborate The IASWECE Birth to Three Working Group is preparing a study...
WECAN Early Childhood February Conferences 2018
Fri 09.02.2018 - Sun 11.02.2018
The Development of Speech and the Human EncounterFebruary 9-11, Spring Valley, NYFebruary 16-19,...
The Future of Education, Healing Arts and Health Care
Sat 17.02.2018 - Tue 20.02.2018
Truth, Beauty and Goodness: The Future of Education, Healing Arts and Health...
International Training Weeks
Mon 12.03.2018 - Thu 29.03.2018
  High School Education at Steiner Waldorf Schools 1st WEEK | 12 – 16 MARCH 2018...


Please Donate



Subscribe to our mailing list

With kind support by